Technology

Frontend Development

Fast, accessible interfaces: React 19, Next.js 15, Motion - CWV budgets enforced in CI.

Overview

Where it fits.

We build interfaces that are fast by budget, accessible by default, and maintainable by contract. Server-rendered where it counts, interactive where it earns it.

Tools

What we reach for.

React
19
component model
MITdocs →
Next.js
15
SSR + RSC
MITdocs →
TypeScript
5.x
types end-to-end
Apache-2.0docs →
Motion
12
choreography
MITdocs →
Embla Carousel
8
accessible carousels
MITdocs →
Tailwind CSS
4
design tokens in utilities
MITdocs →
Vitest
3
unit + component tests
MITdocs →
Storybook
8
component docs
MITdocs →

Use cases

What it's great for.

SaaS dashboards
dense tables, real-time updates
E-commerce storefronts
sub-second LCP, CWV budgets
Design systems
tokens + Storybook handoff
Marketing sites
SEO-first, motion with restraint

Pairings

Plays well with.

backend developmentcontract-first APIs with OpenAPI
mobile developmentshared design tokens across surfaces
cloud devopsedge rendering + CI budgets

As a service

Where this stack ships.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Why React over other frameworks?

Team depth, ecosystem maturity, and hiring reality - benchmarks confirm the choice per project.

SSR or SPA?

SSR where SEO and LCP matter; islands for interactivity. The page decides.

How is a11y enforced?

axe gates in CI plus manual keyboard passes before handoff.

Performance budgets?

CWV budgets enforced in CI; red blocks merge.

Do you deliver design systems?

Yes - tokens JSON plus Storybook stories per component.