Skip to main content

Now onboarding Q3 projects

Back to all essays
engineering·6 min read

Evals Before Demos: Shipping Grounded RAG to Production

Why benchmark scorecards in CI matter more than flashy chat demos, and how we enforce hallucination boundaries with pgvector and automated eval suites.

AM
Alex MorenoFounder & Principal Engineer

When engineering teams rush generative AI into production, the biggest failure mode isn't latency or token cost—it's unmeasured drift and ungrounded hallucination.

The Demo Trap A chat demo on 20 hand-picked sample documents almost always looks miraculous. But when you expose the assistant to 50,000 corporate records, subtle ambiguities, and conflicting policy revisions, ad-hoc prompt tweaks collapse.

Evals as CI Quality Gates At DosVectis, we treat retrieval evaluations the exact same way we treat regression test suites: 1. **Groundedness Scoring:** Automated checks verifying that every assertion made by the model maps directly to a citation chunk. 2. **Answer Relevance:** Measuring cosine similarity between user intent and generated synthesized answers. 3. **Faithfulness Matrix:** Rejecting responses when citation overlap drops below 92%.

# Automated CI eval step
from ragas import evaluate

scorecard = evaluate(test_dataset, metrics=[faithfulness, answer_relevancy]) assert scorecard['faithfulness'] >= 0.92, 'Eval regression: hallucination threshold failed' ```

Private-by-Default Architecture Customer data never traverses third-party training pipelines. By utilizing localized embedding stores in pgvector with strict tenant-level row isolation and automated PII masking proxies, enterprise retrieval stays auditable, secure, and compliant.

Written By

Alex Moreno

Founder & Principal Engineer

Specializes in Architecture + delivery. Part of the senior core team delivering high-leverage software at DosVectis.

Further Reading

Related Essays